Prosecutors Seek to Reinstate Trump Case Amid Legal Dispute

Prosecutors push Trump case as the U.S. mounts a significant effort to reinstate the criminal case against former President Donald Trump concerning the mishandling of classified documents and obstruction. The prosecution’s move comes in response to a recent decision by a Florida judge, which dismissed the indictment earlier this summer. With the presidential election approaching in less than three months, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office has requested that an appeals court overturn the ruling made by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon.

Dispute Over Judge Cannon’s Ruling

Judge Cannon, appointed by Trump in 2020, ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional. She argued Congress didn’t grant Merrick Garland authority for this. Cannon also claimed using federal funds for Smith’s investigation violated the Constitution. Her ruling questions the legality and constitutionality of Special Counsel appointments.

Judge Cannon’s ruling challenges the constitutionality of Special Counsel appointments, questioning Congress’s authority and federal funding use, according to wsj login.

Prosecutors’ Argument Against Cannon

Prosecutors push Trump case argue that Cannon’s ruling contradicts established legal decisions and Supreme Court rulings on the Attorney General’s appointment authority. They assert her interpretation diverges from DOJ and federal practices. They warn it could undermine the legality of numerous executive branch officials. The ruling might have significant impacts on both the judicial and executive branches.

Concerns About Historical Practices

Smith’s office criticized Judge Cannon for ignoring historical precedents on special counsels and focusing too much on naming conventions. Prosecutors argue that minor differences between roles like special counsel and special prosecutor don’t affect the Attorney General’s authority. They emphasize that the key issue is the special counsel’s effective functioning and legitimacy, not the specific terminology.

Timeline for Appeal

Smith’s office has not sought an expedited process for the appeal before the November 5 presidential election. Former President Trump is anticipated to respond to the government’s brief within approximately a month. Following this, the government will have a three-week period to reply. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet scheduled a hearing date and has not responded to requests for comment on the matter.

Democratic National Convention Focuses on Trump

As the Democratic National Convention unfolds this week, former President Donald Trump is facing intense scrutiny and mockery from…

Trump Campaign’s Position

Trump Campaign spokesman Steven Cheung stated that the appeals court should uphold Cannon’s dismissal of the “Lawless Indictment.” He argues this dismissal is crucial. Cheung also criticized other actions taken by the Justice Department. Cannon’s 93-page opinion came after over a year. Trump’s initial indictment charged him with retaining sensitive national defense documents. He was also charged with obstructing their retrieval.

Additional Prosecutions and Charges

In addition to the Florida case, Trump faces another prosecution brought by Special Counsel Smith in Washington, where he is charged with conspiring to obstruct the 2020 presidential election. Following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling this summer, Smith’s office is deliberating on the next steps, particularly concerning Trump’s immunity from charges related to his official presidential acts. The Florida case also includes charges against Trump’s personal aide, Waltine “Walt” Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira, a property manager at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate

Subscribe to the NY Times and WSJ Combo Deal for unlimited access to their full libraries, news archives, PDFs, podcasts, live WSJ TV, daily news, and audio articles. Stay updated on Wall Street and stock market news. Save 77% today!